Skip to main content

Six Months After AT&T Bought T-Mobile USA

Six months have passed since the AT&T deal to buy T-Mobile was announced, see link here. I was confident the deal would go through. After all, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) does a horrible job at preventing monopolies/oligopolies.

I, along with 44,000 thousand other people (that has to be a record), filed a public comment on the FCC page for filing 11-65,  "In the Matter of applications of AT&T Inc. and Deutsche Telekom AG for consent to assign or Transfer Control of licenses and Authorizations."

Here is my public comment filed on May 02, 2011:
I strongly urge the FCC to not allow the acquisition of T-mobile USA by AT&T because it would negatively impact the cell phone industry for consumers with higher prices and less innovation.
The higher prices and innovation will be a direct result of decreasing the number of national carriers from 4 to 3. AT&T can say what they want about regional carriers (i.e., Metro PCS), but for most people the regional carriers are not a option since they do not have national coverage and their list of available phones does not include the most wanted phones. And with Sprint having "shaky" earnings the last couple of years, we might be left with only two national carriers. 
T-mobile, as the fourth largest carrier, came up with innovative ways to reach customers. They introduced the MyFavs plan and gambled on Android plus they kept monthly plan prices relatively low. In contrast AT&T, has relied on their iPhone deal, to gain customers and profits, yet they did not fully resolve the dropped calls issue, especially for people running without a 3G band at the moment.
AT&T with all of their financial security compared to Sprint and T-mobile has lagged in creating their 4G network. I would respect a company more if looked 10 years in the future rather than 3 months at a time. FCC, please do not allow AT&T to purchase T-mobile USA. Thank you for your time.
Well, not only has the FCC received an inordinate amount of public comments against the merger, we now have significant court filing against the "merger". Here is a list of entities that have filed antitrust legislation against the AT&T/ T-Mobile deal:

  1. Sprint Nextel Inc.
  2. Cellular South Inc.
  3. US Department of Justice
  4. State of CA
  5. State of NY
  6. State of IL
  7. State of PA
  8. State of OH
  9. State of WA
Will the deal go through? Most likely, yes. However, many concessions will have to be made (e.g., AT&T giving spectrum to competitors). 

The best part of this whole fiasco has to be the propaganda that AT&T is putting out. Like when they said that the "merger" would be creating jobs due to the aggressive 4G LTE expansion proposed after the deal is done. Carefully worded, I guess they forgot about all the T-Mobile employees that would be losing their jobs. Has anybody every heard of a merger in which the net outcome is more jobs?

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Outdated! Charter Cable Box UI

When I was living with my old roommates, we used Direct TV and Time Warner Cable to satisfy our TV cravings. While I hated, hate, and will always hate Direct TV for their barbaric two year contracts, I give them credit for having a neat looking user interface (UI). But because of their two year contract and lies, we cancelled. We paid about $400 dollars to get Direct TV's grubby paws out of our living room. At that point, it wasn't about the money, it was about principles. And so a happier relationship was started with Time Warner Cable. Though a lot of things were better with Time Warner Cable, I couldn't help but notice their cable boxes' UI was "fugly". Little did I know... Recently, I've moved away from the parents  old roommates. The new area I'm in is serviced by Charter Cable. I was shocked by the UI of the Charter cable boxes.  See picture below: The UI of the Charter cable box made Time Warner Cable's UI look like it was from the year

The Death of the Paper Receipt

Yesterday, I was surprised by the use of an "old" technology, the e-mail, used in a new way. This started when I accompanied my wife to Macy's so that she could get some Origins lotion. Why women have to shop is beyond me, why women have to buy expensive lotion is also beyond me. Men, just know that is how they are, you can only hope to contain their appetite to shop, good luck! It is funny how they always "need" something. Makes you wonder if women understand the meaning of the word "need"... Either way, I love my wife. Anyways, back to the expensive lotion. After doing some asking at the Origins section of Macy's, my wife has the lotion she wants, Ginger Souffle. We take the lotion to the counter to pay. After I hand the young lady helping us at the counter my credit card, she asks me if I want a paper receipt or an electronic receipt. I am confused. I have never been given this option before. I ponder, "Well a paper receipt is nice,

iPhone 4S Announced and Not iPhone 5

Today Apple announced their fifth iPhone, we have had, in order: June 2007, iPhone July 2008, iPhone 3G  June 2009, iPhone 3GS June 2010, iPhone 4 For this iPhone, we were all hoping for an iPhone 5, which is to mean, a redesigned phone. Instead we got an updated iPhone 4, we got the iPhone 4S.  What we did NOT get: A bigger screen, the iPhone 4S will be the usual 3.5". 4G! This is huge, can people wisely enter into a two year contract without 4G. 3G might be good enough now, but what will happen in a year with carriers shifting their resources to 4G LTE? When websites continue to demand more bandwidth? When our lives inch closer to the cloud? This launch reminds me of the first iPhone, the 3G technology was there, but Apple chose the safe route and went with 2G. When Apple released the iPhone 3G a year later, it rendered the first iPhone obsolete. Many mactards were "forced" to upgrade.   What we DID get: A dual core processor and bump in RAM